Ban on Candidate Contribution Sticks
You will learn that from the recent cases, courts actually maintained a ban on businesses contributing unlimited funds to campaigns. You will realize that around 90% of Americans prefer having the role of money in politics to be put under control. This is what has made so many people to eagerly wait for the ruling so as to know what role the corporates will take in financing politics in future. The decision taken up by the Supreme Court will without a doubt bot go well with so many people. They refused to lift the ban on this political campaign finance law. As you go on reading, you will discover more about why this ruling was taken into account.
You need to understand that nothing really happened in court. Even without taking into account the challenges in the prevailing campaign finance laws, the Supreme Court chose to go with it. As such, no corporate will be free to donate their money to campaigns or even candidates. It is through this decision that the role of corporates in the political arena is being tamed. You will find that in previous instances, corporates has the room to donate to campaign kitties from time to time. This would often be allowed if the money is not tied to a particular individual. You will learn that this case was brought to court by two companies from Massachusetts. this case was aimed at improving the sense of financial responsibilities as well as economic opportunities. It will actually be more prudent for you to consider a good lawyer in case of such a big case.
It is also important for you to understand the legal argument behind this particular case. You will note that these companies intimated that the first amendment rights of companies was being overlooked. The argument was based on the fact that political donations were components of freedom of speech. They also invoked the constitution which seeks to protect every individual equally. It is evident that nonprofit as well as charity organizations are not allowed to finance any of these political campaigns. This in itself shows that corporate entities are receiving preferential treatment. This certainly goes against what the dictates of the constitution are.
It is imperative to mention that what the high court ruled was still favored. This ruling claimed that corporates are not allowed to donate money to political campaigns. This is because it could easily lead to corruption in politics. This means that all political candidates will be forbidden from accepting such donations from various corporations.